Reading Prof. Matsui's paper
and Prof. Samamoto's paper, I think principal component
analysis or discriminant function is suited for analyzing the data. But I found no
such papers -- till now. Why? So I'm going to try!
Please read textbooks of multiple variant analisys if you
want to know more about it.
But I have no statistical software -- mmmh. Finally I make up the numbers "blood-type scores" (these numbers correspond to discriminant functions if distribution of each blood types are the same). "Blood-type scores" are such numbers that the characteristics of each blood type are applicable to specific blood types. The higher the numbers are, the "likelier" the characteristics are.
Calculation is easy. Calculate distances of each blood types from the average of four blood types. Let's try the data of Prof. Matsui's paper first! I'll calculate "Type-O score" for example:
Calculate the average of four blood types using Table 2. Then the difference between the average and Type O becomes "Type O coefficient". To caluculate "Type-O score" of the certain blood type, miltiply each values (difference from the average) and "Type-O coefficients", then sum up all the twenty questions. After all, I get 378.50 for "Type-O score" of Type O itself.
How to Calculate "Type-O Score" of Type O Itself
Items
Type O Type A Type B Type AB Average Type-O
CoefficentType-O
Score1. I am particular with everything
55.5 53.3 47.1 55.9 52.95
2.55
6.50
2. I care about it to the person of the surroundings
57.1 63.1 58.7 61.8 60.18
-3.08
9.46
3. I suppress my feeling and desire
54.4 61.8 57.2 63.2 59.15
-4.75
22.56
4. I esteem rules, customs and orders
57.7 54.7 50.7 41.2 51.08
6.63
43.89
5. I am seeking my reason for living
84.6 84.4 84.1 82.4 83.88
0.72
0.53
6. I am not influenced by the surroundings
25.3 31.6 20.3 29.4 26.65
-1.35
1.82
7. I do not like be controlled, constrained by person
86.8 86.2 92.0 88.2 88.30
-1.50
2.25
8. I understand new things and flexible thought
56.6 70.2 67.4 69.1 65.83
-9.23
85.10
9. I open heart to people
54.4 49.3 52.9 47.1 50.93
3.48
12.08
10. I am optimistic to the future 46.2 52.9 52.2 67.6 54.73
-8.53
72.68
11. I think straightly 44.0 45.8 39.9 41.2 42.73
1.28
1.63
12. I have clear two-facedness of emotionally stable and unstable 57.1 58.2 63.8 61.8 60.23
-3.13
9.77
13. I am distant to people 33.5 40.4 41.3 45.6 40.20
-6.70
44.89
14. I am not able to be absorbed to anything 28.0 22.7 23.2 23.5 24.35
3.65
13.32
15. I am a good analyst and critic 42.9 44.0 45.7 47.1 44.93
-2.03
4.10
16. I treat people with smile and carefully 41.2 39.1 45.7 42.6 42.15
-0.95
0.90
17. I am both romatic and realistic 80.8 80.4 81.2 94.1 84.13
-3.33
11.06
18. I care human relations, especially esteem trust of people 84.6 84.9 79.7 80.9 82.53
2.07
4.31
19. I have vitality 35.2 38.2 37.0 52.9 40.83
-5.63
31.64
20. I go straight with persistance and achieve when the purpose is decided 66.5 66.7 65.9 66.2 66.33
0.17
0.03
Total -
- - - -
-
378.50
That calculated about all the blood types with the same way, is the next table.
All "Blood-type Scores" highest in red / lowest in blue
Blood Type
Type-O Score Type-A Score Type-B Score Type-AB Score Type O
378.50 9.53 7.46 -395.49 Type A
9.53 136.17 -54.97 -90.72 Type B
7.46 -54.97 175.01 -127.50 Type AB
-395.49 -90.72 127.50 613.72
The result is so evident. Type AB shows the trend that differs and contrast in comparison with other blood types in this data. Also, contrastive are pair of Type O and Type AB, and pair of Type A and Type B (except Type AB).
Let's try another data of Prof.
Matsui's paper.
This time, calculate "Type-X coefficient" with the
average of four years, then calculate all the blood types of each year and the average.
Blood-type Scores in 1980 highest in red / lowest in blue / consistent for four years in bold
Blood Type
Type-O Score Type-A Score Type-B Score Type-AB Score Type O
-0.08
10.60
-9.78
-0.74
Type A
-1.14
17.54
-17.36
0.96
Type B
-8.98 -30.67 56.35 -16.70 Type AB
10.20 2.52 -29.22 16.49
Blood-type Scores in 1982 highest in red / lowest in blue / consistent for four years in bold
Blood Type
Type-O Score Type-A Score Type-B Score Type-AB Score Type O
23.73
-11.47
-8.25
-4.01
Type A
-6.31
20.41
-18.33
4.24
Type B
-12.40
-15.29
42.83
-15.14
Type AB
-5.01
6.35
-16.25
14.91
Blood-type Scores in 1986 highest in red / lowest in blue / consistent for four years in bold
Blood Type
Type-O Score Type-A Score Type-B Score Type-AB Score Type O
10.99 -14.44 1.71
1.74
Type A
-17.46
56.62 -30.58 -8.58
Type B
-9.40
-19.18 40.92 -12.33
Type AB
15.87
-22.99 -12.04
19.16
Blood-type Scores in 1988 highest in red / lowest in blue / consistent for four years in bold
Blood Type
Type-O Score Type-A Score Type-B Score Type-AB Score Type O
22.08 -12.82 -9.55
0.29
Type A
-3.21
42.27 -34.11 -4.96
Type B
4.92
-35.24 34.23 -3.92
Type AB
-23.79 5.78
9.42 8.59
Blood-type Scores in Average highest in red / lowest in blue / consistent for four years in bold
Blood Type
Type-O Score Type-A Score Type-B Score Type-AB Score Type O
14.18 -7.03
-6.47 -0.68
Type A
-7.03
34.21 -25.09 -2.09
Type B
-6.47
-25.09 43.58 -12.02
Type AB
-0.68
-2.09
-12.02 14.79
The result is so evident, too. Type A and Type B show the clear constrast. Also, contrastive are Type O and Type AB. They are consistent for four years (but Type O and Type AB are not stable), as Mr. Nomi said.
Last update: May 30, 1998.
E-mail: abofan@js2.so-net.ne.jp