ABO式血液型での結果 (H9.10.29)ABO式血液型での結果 (H9.10.29)原題： "The relation of blood types to primary and secondary personality traits." The Mankind Quarterly, pp35-51, Vol. 21, 1980.
ついにＲ．Ｂ．キャッテルの原文を入手しました！
英語の文献もかなりあるようですね。結構昔から研究されているようです。なぜ日本の心理学者は無視するのでしょう？ 全部書くのは大変なので、ちょっとだけ書いておきます。ＡＢＯ式血液型で有意差があったのは次の３つです。
Primariesというのが直接の質問での回答、SecondariesというのがPrimariesの回答を組み合わせて得られた傾向の数値のようです。で、結局、
という竹内久美子さんの引用どおりの結果が得られます。
被実験者と方法 (H9.11.2)SUJECTS AND METHODS
Subjects were unrelated Caucasian
Australian residents. The 156 males and 167 females were drawn
from emplyees of the Commonwealth Serum Laboratories (164),
volunteers from the community in response to radio or personal
appeals (96) and Royal Melbourne Hospital personnel (63). The
mean age was 35.2 with a standard deviation of 16.3 years.
Blood was collected in sterile containers and allowed to
coagulate. The separated serum was kept frozen at -70 degrees and
clots, washed free from adhering white cells and serum using
physiological saline (16), were stored at -20 degrees. Residual
crythrocytes bathed in serum were retained at 4 degrees for blood
typing. The 17 systems involved in the study are listed in table
1
被実験者は、親戚関係にないオーストラリアに住む白人である。男性１５６人、女性１６７人は、英連邦血清研究所（１６４人）、コミュニティでラジオや個人から応募したボランティア（９６人）、王立メルボルン病院職員（６３人）から選ばれた。平均年齢は３５．２歳であり、標準偏差は１６．３歳である。（中略） 研究に使われた１７の遺伝型を表１に示す。
研究に使われた遺伝型 (H9.11.2)TABLE1
GENETIC SYSTEMES USED IN THE STUDY
| System | Factors |
| ABO | A1, A2, B |
| MNSs | M, N, S, s |
| Rhesus | C, Cw, c, D, Du, E, e |
| P | P1 |
| Kell | K, k |
| Duffy | Fya, Fyb |
| Colton | Coa, Cob |
| Adenosine deaminase | ADA1, ADA2 |
| Adenylate kinase | AK1, AK2 |
| 6-Phosphogluconate dehydrogenase | 6-PGD A, 6-PGD B |
| Erythrocyte acid phosphatase | ACP1 A, ACP1 B, ACP1 C |
| Erythrocyte phosphoglucomutase | PGM1 1, PGM 1 2 |
| Haptoglobin | Hp1, Hp2 |
| Complement C3 | F, S |
| Gm | 1, 2, 3 |
| Inv | 1 |
| B-glycoprotein | BGP N, BGP D |
性格因子 (H9.11.2)TABLE 2
DESCRIPTION OF PRIMARY AND SECONDARY PERSONALITY FACTORS
| Primaries Source- Trait Index |
Low-Score Description | High-Score Description |
| A | SIZIA Reserved, detached, crictical, aloof, stiff |
AFFECTIA Outgoing, warmheartedness, easygoing, participating |
| B1 | LOW INTELLIGENCE Dull |
HIGH INTELLIGENCE Bright |
| C | LOWER EGO STRENGTH At mercy of feelings, emotionally less stable, easily upset, changeable |
HIGHER EGO STRENGTH Emotionally stable, mature, faces reality, calm |
| E | SUMMISSIVENESS Humble, mild, easily led, docile, accommodating |
DOMINANCE Assertive, aggressive, competitive, stubborn |
| F | DESURGENCY Sober, taciturn, serious |
SURGENCY Happy-go lucky, gay enthusiastic |
| G | WEAKER SUPEREGO STRENGTH Expedient, disregards rules |
STRONGER SUPEREGO STRENGTH Conscientious, persistent, moralistic |
| H | THRECTIA Shy, timid, threat-sensitive |
PARMIA Venturesome, uninhibited, socially bold |
| I | HARRIA Tough minded, self-reliant, realistic |
PREMSIA Tender minded, sensitive, clinging, overprotected |
| L | ALAXIA Trusting, accepting conditions |
PROTENSION Suspicious, hard to fool |
| M | PRAXERINIA Practical, "down to earth" concerns |
AUTIA Imaginative, bohemian, absent-minded |
| N | ARTLESSNESS Forthright, unpretentious, genuine, but socially clumsy |
SHREWDNESS Astute, polished, socially aware |
| O | UNTROUBLED ADEQUACY Serine |
GUILT PRONESS Worrying, troubled |
| Q1 | CONSERVATIVISM OF TEMPERAMENT Conservative, respecting traditional ideas |
RADICALISM Experimeinting, liberal, free-thinking |
| Q2 | GROUPE ADHERENCE Group-dependent, a "joiner" and sound follower |
SELF-SUFFICIENCY Self-sufficient, resouceful, prefers own decisions |
| Q3 | LOW SELF-SENTIMENT INTEGRATION Undisciplined self conflict, lax, follows own urges, careless of social rules |
HIGH STRENGTH OF Controlled, exacting will power, socailly precise, compulsive,following self image |
| Q4 | LOW ERGIC TENSION Relaxed, tranquilt, torpid, unfrustrated, composed |
HIGH ERGIC TENSION Tense, frustrated, driven, overwrought |
Note: Factor B, intelligence, although not one of the 15 personality factors, being an ability measure, is in its usual position here in the 16 PF scales.
| Secondaries | Weighted Primaries Involved | |
| QI | EXVIA-INVIA (This is the factor case of the popular extraversion-intraversion factor.) |
A, F, H Q2 |
| QII | ANXIETY (This is pure anxiety and not to be confused with the neurotic anxiety in some "anxiety" scales.) |
C, H, L, O, Q3, Q4 |
| QIII | CORTERTIA (Cortical alertness, congnitive activity and control, as opposed to emotionally.) |
A, H, I, M |
| QIV | INDEPENDENCE (General Independence of mind, with dominance and tendency to be analytical.) |
E, F, H, L, M |
| QVIII | INTEGRATIVE CAPACITY OF GOOD UPBRINGING (Moral and social dependability possible due to a higher general capacity to integrate.) |
C, F, G, Q3 |
Ｆ検定の結果 (H9.11.2)TABLE 3
PERSONALITY FACTORS AND BLOOD GROUP SYSTEM GIVING SIGNIFICANT F TESTS
| Primaries | Secondaries | |||||||||||||
| System | A | B | C | G | H | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | QI | QII | QIV | QVIII | |
| ABO | 2.94 | 4.44 | 3.10 | |||||||||||
| Rh(C) | 5.02 | |||||||||||||
| Rh(E) | 3.14 | 3.31 | ||||||||||||
| MN | 5.28 | |||||||||||||
| P | 10.51 | 5.26 | 9.28 | 6.77 | 8.62 | 6.03 | 13.51 | 5.08 | ||||||
| Kell | 4.46 | 4.22 | ||||||||||||
| 6-PGD | 3.86 | |||||||||||||
| ACP1 | 3.96 | |||||||||||||
| BGP | 4.22 | |||||||||||||
p<0.05 / p<0.01
/ p<0.001
Duncan multiple
range 検定の結果 (H9.11.2)TABLE 4
APPLICATION OF MULTIPLE RANGE TESTS TO MULTIPLE ALLELE SYSTEMS, TO ISOLATE SPECIFICE SIGNIFICANT DIFFERENCES
| PRIMARY FACTORS | Phonotype | Mean | Sample Size | Linkages not Significant* | |
| Factor A and the MN System | MM | 8.151 | 98 | | | |
| NN | 8.549 | 71 | | | | | |
| MN | 9.403 | 154 | | | ||
| MN greater than MM at p<0.01 | |||||
| Factor A and Rh(C) System | CC | 8.079 | 64 | | | |
| cc | 8.504 | 111 | | | ||
| Cc | 9.409 | 147 | |||
| CC greater than cc and CC at p<0.05. CC greater than CC at p<0.01. |
|||||
| Factor G and ACP1 System | B | 8.210 | 144 | | | |
| A | 8.636 | 30 | | | ||
| CA | 8.645 | 6 | | | ||
| BA | 8.967 | 120 | | | | | |
| CB | 11.250 | 23 | | | ||
| CB has a
significantly higher mean the all other groups
(p<.0.01). The mean of all other groups are homogeneous. |
|||||
| Factor Q2 and ABO System | B | 10.807 | 32 | | | |
| A | 11.778 | 131 | | | ||
| O | 11.866 | 148 | | | | | |
| AB | 14.392 | 12 | | | ||
| AB has a significantly lower (p<0.05)
mean than A or B, but not O. Groups B, A and O have homogeneous means. |
|||||
| Factor Q3 and ABO System | A | 8.451 | 131 | | | |
| AB | 9.573 | 12 | | | | | |
| O | 9.591 | 148 | | | ||
| B | 10.075 | 32 | | | ||
| A has a
significantly lower (p<0.01) mean than O and B, but not from AB. Groups AB, O and B have homogeneous mean. |
|||||
| Factor QII and ABO System | O | -0.660 | 148 | | | |
| B | -0.550 | 32 | | | | | |
| AB | +0.713 | 12 | | | | | |
| A | +0.812 | 131 | | | ||
| Groups A and O are
significantly different from each other (p<0.01) but group O is not significantly different from B and AB, nor is group A significantly different from B and AB. A is significantly higher than O (p<0.05). |
|||||
| Factor QVIII and ACP1 System | CB | +2.229 | 23 | | | |
| CA | -0.077 | 6 | | | | | |
| BA | +0.261 | 120 | | | ||
| A | +0.059 | 30 | | | ||
| B | -0.599 | 144 | | | ||
| CB is significantly highter (p<0.05) than all except CA. | |||||
| Factor QIV and Rh(E) System | EE | +2.619 | 7 | | | |
| Ee | +0.419 | 101 | | | ||
| ee | -0.268 | 214 | |||
| ee is significantly lower (p<0.05) than EE and Ee. | |||||
*Any line covering two or three groups means there is no significant differences among them.
検定結果のまとめ (H9.11.2)TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF DIRECTIONS OF SIGNIFICANT RELATIONS OF ALLELES (WITH DIRECTIONS) TO PERSONALITY FACTORS
| Primaries | Secondaries | |||||||||||||
| System | A | B | C | G | H | Q1 | Q2 | Q3 | Q4 | QI | QII | QIV | QVIII | |
| ABO | AB above A & B p<0.05 |
A below B & O p<0.01 |
A above O p<0.01 |
|||||||||||
| Rh(C) | Cc above CC & cc p<0.01 & p<0.05 |
|||||||||||||
| Rh(E) | EE above Ee p<0.05 |
ee above Ee & EE p<0.05 |
||||||||||||
| MN | NN above MM p<0.01 |
|||||||||||||
| P | P1+ above P1- p<0.01 |
P1+ above P1- p<0.05 |
P1+ above P1- p<0.01 |
P1+ above P1- p<0.05 |
P1+ above P1- p<0.01 |
P1- above P1+ p<0.01 |
P1+ above P1- p<0.05 |
P1- above P1+ p<0.01 |
P1+ above P1- p<0.05 |
|||||
| Kell | K- above K+ p<0.05 |
K+ above K- p<0.05 |
||||||||||||
| 6-PGD | AB above others p<0.05 |
|||||||||||||
| ACP1 | CB above all p<0.01 |
F at p<0.05 |
CA below others p<0.01 |
|||||||||||
| BGP | I above N p<0.05 |
-ive above +ive p<0.05 |
||||||||||||
p<0.05 / p<0.01
/ p<0.001
まとめ (H9.11.2)SUMMARY
A sample of 323 Caucasian Australians was chracterized with respect to 17 genetic systems (7 blood groups, 5 crythrocyte enzymes and 5 plasma protains) and 21 psychological variables (16 primary and 5 secondary personality factors). The mean age corrected psychological scores were determined for each phenotype and comparisons within systems yielded 13 significant differences a to .05 level and 11 at .01 level. The most conclusive finding occurred in the P system: the four primaries producing differences a to .01 level (C, H, Q3, and Q4) are those entering into the second order anxiety facter QII, which yeilded the greatest difference observed in the study (p<.001).
オーストラリアに住む白人３２３人のサンプルを、１７の遺伝型（７つの血液型、５つの赤血球酵素、５つの血清タンパク質）と２１の心理因子（１６の第１次、５つの第２次の性格因子）によって分類した。心理スコアを年齢によって補正し、それぞれの発現型を比較して、危険率５％以下で１３の因子、１％以下で１１の因子に有意差が得られた。最も特徴的なことは、Ｐ式血液型で起こった：４つの第１次因子では危険率１％以下（Ｃ、Ｈ、Ｑ３、Ｑ４）の有意差だったので、第２次因子ＱＩＩは０．１％以下の危険率となり、この研究で最大の有意差が得られた。
| 【H20.10.25追記】 彼のその他の文献は、オンラインで（しかも無料！）入手可能です。(^O^)
|
